Author: Vivian Michael

  • Tinubu Sacks FIRS Boss, Nami, Appoints Zacch Adedeji 

    Tinubu Sacks FIRS Boss, Nami, Appoints Zacch Adedeji 

    President Bola Tinubu has approved the appointment of Hon. Zacch Adedeji as the new Acting Executive Chairman of the Federal Inland Revenue Service (FIRS).

    Chief Ajuri Ngelale, Special Adviser to the President, (Media & Publicity), disclosed in a statement on Thursday.

    Tinubu also directed the erstwhile FIRS Chairman, Mr. Muhammad Nami, to proceed on three months pre-retirement leave, as provisioned by Public Service Rule (PSR) 120243, with immediate effect, leading to his eventual retirement from service on December 8, 2023.

    Hon. Zacch Adedeji is hereby appointed in acting capacity for a 90-day period before his subsequent confirmation as the substantive Executive Chairman of the Federal Inland Revenue Service for a term of four years in the first instance.

    He most recently served the nation as the Special Adviser to the President on Revenue, following meritorious service terms as the Oyo State Commissioner of Finance and as the Executive Secretary / CEO of the National Sugar Development Council (NSDC).

    Adedeji is a First Class graduate in accounting from the Obafemi Awolowo University (OAU), Ile-Ife, Osun State.

    He also holds an MSc degree in accounting from the same OAU.

    The new FIRS chairman also holds a PhD public sector finance, OAU.

    He is a fellow, ICAN, CITN, alumnus, Harvard Kennedy School of Government, ex-manager, Procter & Gamble Company (P&G) and ex-commissioner for finance, Oyo State.

    He is also former Executive Secretary of the National Sugar Development Council (NSDC).

    By these directives of the President, the new appointment takes immediate effect.

  • Appeal Court Sacks Ndudi Elumelu, Declares Okolie Winner 

    Appeal Court Sacks Ndudi Elumelu, Declares Okolie Winner 

    The Abuja division of the Court of Appeal, has sacked the Peoples Democratic Party PDP’s candidate, Ndudi Elemelu as the winner in the recent election for the Aniocha/Oshimili Federal Constituency of Delta State.

    The Appellate Court, by its ruling, overturned the July 24 ruling by the National and State Houses of Assembly Election Tribunal in Asaba, which ruled in favour of Ndudi Elumelu.

    Consequently, the appellate court declared Ngozi Okolie of the Labour Party (LP) as the winner of the election.

    The appeal court, in its judgement faulted the tribunal for voiding Okolie’s election, adding that the Labour Party candidate resigned his appointment as a Senior Special Assistant (SSA) to Delta State Government as required by the Constitution.

    The Court of Appeal agreed with lawyer to the Labour Party, Mahmud Magaji (SAN) that contrary to the finding of the tribunal, Okolie was duly nominated and sponsored by his party.

  • N40m Suit: Court Admits Car Dealer’s Evidence Against Oil Firm, Others

    N40m Suit: Court Admits Car Dealer’s Evidence Against Oil Firm, Others

    Justice Chinyere Nwecheonwu of High Court of the Federal Capital Territory sitting in Kuje, on Wednesday, admitted in evidence, documents and letters to the Central Bank of Nigeria, tendered by Tripple C Motors Ltd against Pagmat Oil and Gas Nig. Ltd, Prudential Steps Savings & Loan and a new generation bank.

    The documents were tendered in evidence through, Dr Adamu Kukuri, the sole witness called by the car dealer in a bid to prove his case against the defendants. 

    Dr Kukuri, Director Tripple C Motors Ltd who adopted his witness statement on oath as his evidence was led in evidence by his lawyer, Ojonimi Apeh Esq.

    Some of the documents tendered by Dr Kukuri and admitted by the court were    complaint letters written to CBN, police interim investigation report, etc.

    Barrister Elvis Utulu, who represented Fidelity bank did not oppose the admissibility of the tendered documents except three letters that were not front loaded.

    But Apeh explained that though, the letters were not front loaded, “they are pleaded”. 

    However, Utulu insisted that he has to go through the documents to enable him prepare for his cross examination of the witness.

    Dr Kukuri urged the court to give judgment in his favour by granting all his prayers. 

    Meanwhile, the court has adjourned to September 18, for cross examination of the claimant’s witness.

    Earlier in the proceeding, Apeh had informed Justice Nwecheonwu, that Pagmat Oil and Gas Nig. Ltd; and Prudential Steps Savings & Loan (2nd and 3rd defendants) respectively, have not been appearing in the matter, despite being served with hearing notices.

    By the suit, Tripple C Motors is claiming against the defendants jointly and severally, the sum of over N40million as compensation for unlawful withholding of its money for a period of 43 months.

    Consequently, the claimant wants the court to declare that the refusal and failure of the defendants to pay it the sum of ₦86,000,000.00 (Eighty-Six Million Naira Only) for supply of cars it made for, and at the instance of the defendants as at when due resulted in the loss of profits/earnings to the claimant in the sum of at least N4,300,000.00 (Four Million Three Hundred Thousand Naira) only per month for a period of 43 months cumulating loss of at least N34,400,000.00 (Thirty-Four Million, Four Hundred Thousand Naira) only for that period and thereby rendering the defendants liable to the claimant in damages.

    “An order directing the defendant to pay the claimant the sum of N34,400,000.00 (Thirty-Four Million, Four Hundred Thousand Naira) only as projected returns and/or loss of anticipated profits/earnings.

    They also want twenty percent interest on the judgment sum per month from the date of judgment until the judgment debt is fully liquidated.  

    “An order directing the defendants to pay the claimant the sum of ₦6,000,000.00 (Six Million Naira) only as cost of this suit. 

    “A declaration that the claimant was entitled to payment of the sum of ₦86,000,000.00 (Eighty-Six Million Naira Only) by the defendant within 30 days of the supply of the cars for and at the instance of the defendant being the value of the cars supplied for and at the instance of the defendant by the Plaintiff on 28/12/2018.

    “A declaration that the refusal and failure of the defendant to pay the Claimant the sum of ₦86,000,000.00 (Eighty-Six Million Naira Only) within 30 banking days from the date of supply of the cars by the claimant for, and at the instance of the defendants is a breach of contract between the claimant and the defendants. 

    In the alternative, the Plaintiff seeks “A declaration that the refusal and failure of the defendants to pay the Claimant the sum of ₦86,000,000.00 (Eighty-Six Million Naira Only) for supply of cars made by the claimant for, and at the instance of the defendants as at when due renders the defendants liable to payment of compensation to the claimant for wrongly holding onto the money of the claimant in a commercial transaction. 

    “An order directing the defendant to pay to the plaintiff an amount which is equal to 20% (twenty percent of N86,000,000.00 (Eighty-Six Million Naira Only) per annum from 12/02/2019 when the said sum of N86,000,000.00 (Eighty-Six Million Naira Only) was due but not paid by the defendant until 06/10/2022 when the defendant paid the claimant the principal contract sum of N86,000,000.00 (Eighty-Six Million Naira Only) as compensation for the wrongful withholding of claimant’s money in a commercial transaction for a period of over 43 months without justification.

    Twenty percent interest on the judgment sum per month from the date of judgment until the judgment debt is fully liquidated.  

    “An order directing the defendants to pay the claimant the sum of ₦6,000,000.00 (Six Million Naira) only as cost of this suit. 

    In a statement of claim, the Claimant avers that the vehicles were only delivered based on the fact that the Block Funds/Irrevocable Standing Order, dated 20th December, 2018 was issued by the banks Utako branch Manager and handed to Dr. Adamu Kukuri, the Claimant’s Director.

    The Claimant averred that upon the expiration of 30 (Thirty) banking days after delivery of the 7 vehicles, no money was paid into her account with Zenith Bank Plc as agreed to and undertaken in the Block Funds/Irrevocable Standing Order. 

  • Subsidy Removal, New School Year, and A Strangulating Economy

    Subsidy Removal, New School Year, and A Strangulating Economy

    Subsidy Removal, New School Year, and A Strangulating Economy

    As a new academic season unfolds in 2023, Nigerian parents are grappling with the far-reaching consequences of the recent removal of petrol subsidies. The resulting increase in school fees and tuition costs has sent shockwaves through households across the nation.

    This article by our correspondent, VIVIAN MICHAEL, delves into the challenges faced by parents as they navigate the intricate web of the current economic situation while ensuring their children receive an education.

    The Annual September Dilemma: For many Nigerian parents, September has become a month of dread. It marks the start of the new academic year, ushering in a season fraught with financial implications. The return of millions of students to school after a long vacation compounds the pressure of back-to-school expenses, particularly for students progressing to higher grades.

    However, the academic year of 2023 bears an unprecedented burden. The removal of petrol subsidies by President Bola Ahmed Tinubu merely three months ago, coupled with the fluctuating value of the naira, has thrust parents into a financial dilemma. They are now expected to pay nearly double the fees they have grown accustomed to.

    As schools at all levels reopen nationwide, parents are grappling with the immense financial pressure they face. The hike in school fees and the escalating prices of essential items have exacerbated their struggles. Income levels have largely remained stagnant, and the country’s inflexible economy has exacerbated the hardship experienced by its citizens.

    Small-scale businesses, a significant source of livelihood for many, continue to be hampered by erratic power supply, forcing them to rely on costly fuel-powered generators. Adding to the woes, salaries have remained unchanged. To compound the situation, schools now require parents to provide bank payment evidence before admitting their children, further straining already stretched budgets.

    Uncertain Grace Periods and Financial Stress: Parents express concerns about whether schools will extend the customary grace period of two weeks after resumption before sending ‘defaulting’ children home. The mere thought of paying these escalated fees, along with the accompanying expenses for educational materials, is enough to elevate the blood pressure of many parents during this time.

    Private School vs. Public School Debate: Families with children in private schools criticize the government’s allocation of priorities. They argue that government schools lack essential instructional materials and motivated teachers, leading to the burden of exorbitant fees in private institutions. The prevailing sentiment is that those who desire the best education for their children do not patronize public schools due to their dire condition.

    Some parents have reacted to this predicament by transferring their children from private to public schools, where fees are substantially lower. Others have opted for schools with reduced fees.

    The Heart-Wrenching Dilemma of Roseline Agboola: Roseline Agboola, a 45-year-old civil servant and mother of three, shares her lamentations about the soaring cost of school fees as students prepare to return to school. She considers withdrawing her children from a private school due to the fee increase. However, a friend who teaches in a public school advises against it, citing inadequate facilities for a conducive learning environment. Roseline finds herself in a daunting situation, forced to struggle to pay the new fees, which have risen dramatically. Her predicament is echoed by many parents who, like her, rely solely on their salaries.

    Rita Obi’s Shocking Financial Reality: Mrs. Rita Obi, also a civil servant, is astonished by the drastic price increase for her two-year-old school bus service, which has risen from N15,000 to N35,000—a staggering 100% increment. While she acknowledges the economic challenges, Rita is disheartened by the unexpected surge in expenses, emphasizing the need for divine grace and enablement to cope.

    Ahmed Awofolu’s Frustration and Uncertainty: Ahmed Awofolu’s frustration is palpable as he grapples with the uncertainty of how to proceed. He contemplates sacrificing the quality of education by transferring his children to a more affordable school within walking distance or accessible via inexpensive transportation. Ahmed highlights the significant expenses associated with his children’s education, from tuition to books, school bus fees, excursions, and other miscellaneous costs. He is at a loss for a solution, expressing his reliance on divine intervention and miracles to navigate this challenging period.

    Olakunle Abiodun’s Plea for Government Assistance: Olakunle Abiodun, a parent with five children in school, appeals to the government for financial assistance. He acknowledges the difficulty of paying school fees for his children, particularly those in private schools. Abiodun’s family has resorted to paying fees in instalments to manage the financial strain.

    Ifeoma Asika’s Optimism Amid Economic Struggles: In the midst of these economic challenges, Ifeoma Asika, a small-scale businesswoman, shares her optimism. She acknowledges that both the high and mighty are experiencing similar hardships. Ifeoma emphasizes the need for resilience, believing that people will overcome these tough times and emerge stronger. She also shares her experience of enrolling all her children in school without undue stress by discovering a school with more affordable fees.

    The removal of subsidies and the economic challenges faced by Nigerian parents as they send their children back to school in 2023 paint a stark picture of their struggles. The increase in school fees, stagnant incomes, and rising costs of educational materials have placed an enormous burden on families. Some have opted to shift their children from private to public schools, while others grapple with the financial dilemma.

    Parents are making difficult decisions, contemplating sacrifices, and praying for miracles as they strive to provide their children with an education. They call on the government to consider subsidies or financial support to alleviate the strain. Despite the hardships, there is resilience and hope that Nigerians will overcome these trying times and emerge stronger in the end.

  • EFCC returns property to American internet fraud victim

    EFCC returns property to American internet fraud victim

    The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC) has successfully returned recovered assets to an American fraud victim, Cheryldene Cook, following the conviction of the fraudster, Aisosa Ohue, also known as Frederick Leonard.

    The handover ceremony took place in Abuja and included various valuable items.

    In a statement released by the EFCC spokesperson, Wilson Uwujaren, it was revealed that the returned assets comprised N19 million in cash and a three-bedroom semi-detached duplex located in Ward 36A Amagba Community, Oredo Local Government Area of Edo State.

    Additionally, a Lexus E350 saloon car, an iPhone 13 Pro Max, and a Samsung A31 phone were among the items presented to the victim.

    Cheryldene Cook, who had flown in from the United States of America to receive the recovered assets, was accompanied by her lawyer, Dr. Mike Nwosu.

    During the ceremony, Cook expressed her gratitude to the EFCC for its efforts in recovering her assets.

    The forfeiture of the assets was ordered by Justice C.E Nwecheonwu of the Federal Capital Territory High Court, Kuje, in January. Aisosa Ohue was convicted on three counts, including obtaining money by false pretence, for defrauding the victim in a love scam by impersonating the famous actor Frederick Leonard.

  • Tinubu’s election victory uncontestable, Tribunal rules

    Tinubu’s election victory uncontestable, Tribunal rules

    *Dismisses all petitions against him

    The Presidential Election Petition Court on Wednesday dismissed all the three petitions filed before the cit which challenged the February 2023 presidential election that produced Ahmed Bola Tinubu as the winner.

    The five-man panel led by Justice Haruna Tsunami unanimously held that the petition by Alhaji Atiku Abubakar of the Peoples Democratic Party(PDP), Mr Peter Obi of the Labour Party (LP)and the Allied Peoples Party (APM) lack merit.

    Giving the verdict, the court held that the Petitioners failed to prove their case beyond reasonable doubt that the presidential election was marred by malpractice and irregularities.

    Consequently, the court held that the return of Ahmed Bola Tinubu as elected President by Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) is right and subsists.

  • Tribunal: No mandatory provision for electronic result transmission in Electoral Act

    Tribunal: No mandatory provision for electronic result transmission in Electoral Act

    The Presidential Election Petitions Court has provided clarity on the use of electronic transmission of election results, asserting that the Electoral Act 2022 does not mandate it.

    In a ruling led by Justice Haruna Tsammani on Wednesday, the five-man panel emphasized that the only technological device required for Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) use is the Bimodal Voter Accreditation System (BVAS).

    Regarding compliance with the Electoral Act and INEC Regulations and Guidelines, Justice Tsammani stated that there is no indication in the regulations that BVAS must electronically transmit polling unit results.

    Furthermore, the Tribunal clarified that the commission’s Results Viewing Portal (IReV) is not a collation system. This interpretation aligns with the judgment in the case of Oyetola vs INEC.

    Justice Tsammani highlighted, “There is no provision for the electronic transmission of election results in the Electoral Act 2022.” He underscored that any such transmission is, at best, optional.

  • Just In: Labour Party rejects Tribunal’s verdict, promises legal consultation

    Just In: Labour Party rejects Tribunal’s verdict, promises legal consultation

    The leadership of the Labour Party has officially rejected the verdict handed down by the Presidential Election Petitions Tribunal, following the dismissal of their petitions by the panel led by Justice Haruna Tsammani.

    In a swift reaction to the tribunal’s judgment, the National Publicity Secretary of the Labour Party, Obiora Ifoh, issued a statement in Abuja on Wednesday, stating their firm rejection of the outcome.

    The party’s petitions had been dismissed by the tribunal, which referred to them as being “clearly based on rhetoric.”

    The Labour Party had raised several claims in its petitions, including the nullification of Bola Tinubu’s declaration as the election winner due to his failure to secure 25 percent of the votes in the Federal Capital Territory (FCT), doubts about Tinubu’s eligibility following legal issues in the United States, and allegations of the Independent National Electoral Commission’s failure to transmit election results to the INEC election results viewer, among other issues.

    While urging its supporters to remain calm, Obiora Ifoh hinted at the party’s intention to consult with its legal team before making a final decision on the next course of action.

    He emphasized, “The Labour Party watched with dismay and trepidation the dismissal of petitions by the five-man panel of the Presidential Election Petition Court… we reject the outcome of the judgment in its entirety because justice was not served and it did not reflect the law and the desire of the people.”

    Ifoh also acknowledged the party’s legal team for their unwavering dedication and commitment in the face of a challenging legal battle. He concluded by expressing the party’s determination to pursue the cause of democracy in Nigeria, promising that the party’s official position would be communicated after a thorough review of the Certified True Copy of the judgment.

    The statement concluded with an encouraging message, emphasizing that “a new Nigeria is ‘POssible’,” and called on all supporters of democracy to remain focused and hopeful in the pursuit of justice.

  • Alleged $460,000 Fraud: No evidence of trial, conviction against Tinubu – Tribunal rules

    Alleged $460,000 Fraud: No evidence of trial, conviction against Tinubu – Tribunal rules

    *Says Tinubu ’eminently’ qualified

    The Presidential Election Petition Court has ruled against allegations of fraud and drug allegations leveled against President Bola Tinubu by the presidential candidate of the Labour Party, Mr Peter Obi.

    The former governor of Anambra State and his party, claimed Tinubu was made to forfeit the sum of $460,000 to the US over alleged complicity in drug related offences in the early 90s.

    The Petitioners, were among other things alleged that by virtue of a forfeiture order against Tinubu by a United States District Court, his name ought not to be on the ballot.

    However, the court in it’s judgment  held that the Petitioners failed to substantiate the above mentioned allegation, consequently, it held that the respondent was eminently qualified to contest the election.

    Justice Tsunami held that Obi failed to prove that Tinubu was found guilty of any offence involving any act of dishonesty, adding that evidence before the court showed that the forfeiture order against Tinubu was in a civil, an allegation against a bank and not criminal matter.

    The five-man panel held that Tinubu was neither arraigned nor convicted in the US over any alleged crime to warrant his disqualification.

    “The Petitioners failed to prove that Tinubu went through any criminal trial, any form of sentences imposed on him. No record of any form of criminal arrest recorded in the USA. 

    “A general search was conducted and there was no records of any criminal charges against Tinubu.

    “The result of the search were negative of any criminal charge arrest and conviction.” 

    The court noted that documents tendered by the respondents confirmed that he was given a clean bill of health after enquiry from Nigeria.

    Beside, the tribunal held that under Section 269(1&2) such documents must be given under the hand Police official and must be accompanied with a certificate showing that the police officer has powers to sign such documents.

    Justice Tsunami further held that even if Tinubu were convicted for the alleged offence, for him to be disqualified from the 2023 election, the purported conviction must take place within 10 years to the election.

    On the Obi’s claim that the 

    results of the election were not transmitted real time to the INEC’s Results Viewing (IReV) portals,  the court held there is no where in the Electoral Act, that says election must be electronically transmitted for collation.

    It maintained that Sections 14&18 of the Electoral Act provides for the use of the Bi-modal Verification Accreditation System (BVAS) for the purpose of accreditation of voters, but ” IReV is not a collation system”.

    Therefore, it dismissed the claim of not compliance with the Electoral Act, 2022.

    “It should be noted as decided by this court previously, the BVAS is to transmit results to IREV. The IREV is not a collation system/center,” the court held .

    The court also held that the testimonies of 10 out of 13 witnesses called by Obi and LP were worthless, adding that no witness can give evidence in chief if his statement on oath is not properly before the court .

    “By combined provisions of section 285 of the Nigeria Constitution as amended and paragraph 14(1) and 14 of the schedule of the Electoral Act, the Petitioner cannot be allowed to file and use witness statement filed outside 21 days”.

  • Breaking: FCT lacks special status, equal to all others, Tribunal rules

    Breaking: FCT lacks special status, equal to all others, Tribunal rules

    In a recent development, the Presidential Election Petition Court has clarified that the Federal Capital Territory (FCT) does not hold a special status and is not of greater significance than any other state in Nigeria.

    Previously, the Labour Party and its presidential candidate, Peter Obi, asserted in their petitions that President Bola Tinubu had not garnered 25% of the votes in Abuja, which, according to them, rendered his victory in the polls invalid.

    However, during the ruling on the preliminary objections raised by the respondents, the panel’s chairman, Justice Haruna Tsammani, explicitly stated that Abuja does not enjoy a unique or elevated status in comparison to other Nigerian states.

    He emphasized, “This court acknowledges that the FCT does not possess any special status and is on equal footing with all other states in Nigeria.”