Author: Vivian Michael

  • Delta Guber: Supreme Court upholds Oborevwori’s victory

    Delta Guber: Supreme Court upholds Oborevwori’s victory

    The Supreme Court on Friday, refused to nullify the election of Sheriff Oborevwori as the executive Governor of Delta State, as it dismisses Chief Ikie Aghwarianovwe’s appeal.

    The Apex court maintained that the appeal before it lacked merit and ordered an N6 million fine against the appellant.

    In a unanimous decision, the Apex court dismissed a pre-election case that challenged Oborevwori’s eligibility to contest the March 8 governorship election.

    Justice Emmanuel Agim said it found no reason to set aside decisions of the Federal High Court and the Court of Appeal, which had earlier dismissed the case against Governor Oborevwori.

    The Asaba Division of the Federal High Court, challenged the nomination of Oborevwori as candidate of the PDP for the gubernatorial election, seeking his disqualification. 

    According to him, Oborevwori, who was formerly the Speaker of the Delta State House of Assembly, submitted false documents to the Independent National Electoral Commission, INEC, to aid his qualification.

    In his defense, Oborevwori, contended that the suit was statute-barred, stressing that documents the plaintiff relied upon to seek his disqualification, pertained to the 2019 general elections.

    Challenging the plaintiff’s locus standi to file the suit, the respondent also argued that documents submitted to INEC in 2018 could not be a basis for the disqualification of a candidate in 2023.

    However, the lower court, in its judgment, upheld all the preliminary objections and accordingly dismissed the suit. 

    Irked by the decision, the plaintiff headed to the Appeal Court for further legal exercise.

    The appellate court, in its decision delivered by Justice Peter Olabisi Ige, upheld the verdict of the trial court and resolved all the issues for determination, in favour of Governor Oborevwori. 

    The appellate court went ahead and ordered the appellant to pay a cost of N2 million to the PDP and Governor Oborevwori. 

    Not satisfied with the judgment of the appellate court, Chief Ikie filed an appeal before the Supreme Court.

  • Alleged N805m fraud: Supreme Court frees Nwaoboshi

    Alleged N805m fraud: Supreme Court frees Nwaoboshi

    The Supreme Court, Friday, nullified the conviction of Senator Peter Nwaoboshi who represents Delta North, and his sentencing to seven years imprisonment for offences of fraud and money laundering.

    The apex court also ordered his immediate release from Ikoyi Prison in Lagos, where he is currently being held.

    The Economic and Financial Crime Commission (EFCC) had accused Nwaoboshi and his companies of illegally acquiring a property named Guinea House on Marine Road, in Apapa, Lagos, for N805 million, the property said to belong to the Delta State Govt.

    Delivering Judgement, the Court also freed the two companies-Golden Touch Construction Project Ltd and Suiming Electrical Ltd – tried with him on a two-count charge brought against them by the Prosecution agency.

    In a split judgement of four-to-one, the Supreme Court set aside the July 1, 2022 judgment of the Court of Appeal, Lagos, which had reversed their discharge and acquittal by a Federal High Court in Lagos.

    In a lead judgment by Justice Emmanuel Agim, the apex court  held that Nwaobishi and the two companies were unjustly and maliciously prosecuted by the EFCC for committing no offences known to law, and  subjected them to  criminal trial in relation civil transaction, needlessly.

    They had claimed that part of the money paid for the property was transferred by Suiming Electrical Ltd on behalf of Nwaoboshi and Golden Touch Construction Project Ltd, adding the funds are believed to be proceeds of their illicit activities.

  • Misconduct: INEC drags suspended Adamawa REC to court

    Misconduct: INEC drags suspended Adamawa REC to court

    The Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) on Thursday said it has instituted a six-count charge against the suspended Resident Electoral Commissioner (REC) deployed to Adamawa State, Barr. Hudu Yunusa Ari.

    The electoral umpire said the case, which is before the Adamawa State High Court sitting in Yola, was premised on unprofessional conduct in the recently concluded Governorship election in the state.

    This was contained in a statement issued by the Chairman of Information and Voter Education Committee (IVEC) and National Commissioner, Festus Okoye Esq., on Thursday.

    It would be recalled that on Tuesday 4th July 2023, the INEC Chairman, Prof. Mahmood Yakubu, during a meeting with RECs, confirmed the receipt of case files from the Nigeria Police following the conclusion of an investigation into alleged electoral offences during the 2023 General Election, including the one involving Barr. Hudu Yunusa Ari, and assured Nigerians of immediate action on the matter.

    Explaining the reason for filing the charges at the Court in Adamawa, Okoye said “As provided by Section 145(1) of the Electoral Act 2022, an offence committed under the Act shall be liable for trial in a Magistrate Court or a High Court of a State in which the offence is committed, or the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja.

    “Furthermore, Section 145(2) of the Act provides that a prosecution under the Act shall be undertaken by legal officers of the Commission, or any legal practitioner appointed by it”, the statement explained.

    Continuing, Okoye said “Having reviewed the case file from the Police which established a prima facie case against Barr. Hudu Yunusa Ari, the Commission has filed a six-count charge against him at the Adamawa State High Court sitting in Yola”

    “Consequently, the Court has fixed Wednesday 12th July 2023 for commencement of trial,” he added.

    Okoye further added that the Commission was working with the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA) for the diligent prosecution of other cases.

  • Assets Declaration: Court grants Abba Kyari N50m bail 

    Assets Declaration: Court grants Abba Kyari N50m bail 

    Justice James Omotoso of the Federal High Court Abuja on Thursday granted suspended Deputy Commissioner of Police (DCP) Abba Kyari bail to the tune of N50 million, with two sureties in like sum.

    The National Drug Law Enforcement Agency (NDLEA) is prosecuting the embattled DCP alongside his two siblings, Mohammed Baba Kyari and Ali Kyari on a 24-count charge of failing to declare assets. 

    Ruling on the suit marked FHC/ABJ/CR/408/2022 

    Justice Omotoso, who had earlier granted bail to the other defendants in the case held that there was no evidence that Kyari was a flight risk and that he will not attend the trial.

    The judge held that the offences with which Abba Kyari and his co-defendants were charged are bailable.

    Justice Omotosho noted that the NDLEA did not deny Abba Kyari’s claim that he was in Kuje prison during the last prison break, but chose to stay put instead of escaping.

    He said: “On the possibility of the 1st defendant attending his trial, it is pertinent to state that, according to the affidavits in support of the application, the applicant stated that he was in detention at the Kuje prisons when the jail break of 5th July, 2022 occurred and he stayed put, even though he had the opportunity of escaping. 

    “This deposition was not challenged by the complainant/respondent which means it is admitted. This shows that the applicant is unwilling to run away from his trial and has shown willingness to attend court when required. 

    “This piece of fact will work in favour of the applicant, in that, it is proof to the court that the applicant would not jump bail if grated same. I note that there have been rulings denying the 1st defendant/applicant bail. 

    “I am, however, minded to grant him bail as he was been in detention for a long time and also based on his constitutional right to bail according to section 36(5) of the Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria, 1999 (as amended). 

    “He has not committed a capital offence neither has it been proved that he is a flight risk. I therefore exercise my discretion in favour of the defendant/applicant.”

    Justice Omotosho added that the sureties must have property worth N25m within jurisdiction, among other conditions, including that Abba kyari and his sureties are to deposit their international passport, their statement of accounts, the title deed of the sureties’ property and recent passport photographs with the Registrar of the court.

    The judge held that, even when Abba Kyari meets the bail conditions, the endorsement of his release warrant is subject to developments in a sister case in which he is being tried with four others on drug related offences.

    Justice Omotosho held that his release warrant in respect of the case before him, will only be signed if the other pending criminal cases are concluded or that he is granted bail in those cases 

    He has been denied bail twice in the other case pending before Justice Emeka Nwite, also of the Federal High Court, Abuja.

    Further hearing in the case before Justice Omotosho has been adjourned till October 18.

    Some of the counts read: 

    That you, DCP. Abba Kyari, male, adult, on or about the 14th day of February 2022 at the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency Headquarters at No. 6, Port Harcourt Crescent, off Gimbiya Street, Area 11, Garki, Abuja, knowingly failed to make full disclosure of your Asset at Plot No. 1927 Blue Fountain Estate, Karsana, Abuja and thereby committed an offence contrary to and punishable under Section 35(3) (a) of the National Drug Law Enforcement 

    Agency Act, CAP N30, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 2004. 

    That you, DCP. Abba Kyari, male, adult, on or about the 14th day of February 2022 at the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency Headquarters at No. 6, Port Harcourt Crescent, off Gimbiya Street, Area 11, Garki, Abuja, knowingly failed to make full disclosure of your Asset, an Estate at Linda Chaulker Road, Asokoro Extension, Abuja, and thereby committed an offence contrary to and punishable under Section 35(3)(a) of the National Drug Law Enforcement Agency Act, CAP N30, Laws of the Federation of Nigeria, 

    That you, DCP. Abba Kyari, male, adult, on or about the 14th day of February 2022 at w. National Drug Law Enforcement Agency Headquarters at No. 6, port Harcourt Crescent, off Gimbiya Street, Area 11, Garki, Abuja knowingly failed to make full disclosure of your asset, a Plaza under construction adjacent to No. 13 Balin Suleiman Street, behind NNPC Petro! Station, Guzape Abuja.

    That you, DCP. Abba Kyari, male, adult, and you, Mohammed Baba Kyari male, adult, on or about the 14th day of February 2022 in Nigeria, in order to disguise the true Ownership of the property situated at Plot No, 33, Bama Road GRA Extension Maiduguri, Borno State Covered by Certificate No: 80/4319 issued by Borno State Government by deposing to false Affidavit at the Federal High Court Maiduguri in suit Number FHC/NG/CS/9/2022 and thereby Committed an offence contrary to Section 18(a) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2011 (As Amended) and punishable under Section 15(3)(a) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2011 (as amended). 

    That you, DCP. Abba Kyari Male, Adult, and you Mohammed Baba Kyari, male, adult, on or about the 14th day of February 2022 in Nigeria in order to disguise the true ownership of the property situated at Plot of land covered by Certificate of Occupancy No: 000271 issued by Maiduguri Metropolitan council Borno State by deposing to false Affidavit at the Federal High Court Maiduguri in suit Number FHC/NG/CS/9/2022 and thereby committed an offence contrary to Section 18(a) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2011 (As Amended) and punishable under Section 15(3)(a) of the Money Laundering (Prohibition) Act, 2011 (As Amended).

  • Justice Aboki confirmed Kano State’s first female Judge

    Justice Aboki confirmed Kano State’s first female Judge

    History was made on Thursday when the Kano State House of Assembly, confirmed Justice Dije Aboki as the state’s substantive Chief Judge (CJ) of the State.

    This followed the consideration of a letter forwarded to the assembly by Governor Abba Kabir-Yusuf and read by the Speaker, Ismail Falgore, during Thursday’s plenary.

    Governor Abdullahi Ganduje had, in March, sworn in Justice Aboki as the acting Chief Judge of the State.

    In another development, the Kano State House of Assembly also confirmed three more commissioner-nominees sent to the Assembly by Governor Kabir-Yusuf.

    The nominees screened are Ibrahim Fagge, Ibrahim Namadi, and Amina Abdullahi -Sani.

    In his remark after the confirmation, Falgore asked the cleared nominees to justify their appointments by being dedicated to their duties when assigned portfolios.

    He urged them to complement the efforts of the governor in the development of the State.

    After the confirmation, the nominees described the opportunity as a call to serve the people of Kano.

  • Tribunal: We won’t whip a dead horse, says APC, closes case against Atiku

    Tribunal: We won’t whip a dead horse, says APC, closes case against Atiku

    The  All Progressives Congress (APC) on Wednesday in Abuja, closed its case against the election petition of Alhaji Abubakar Atiku and the People’s Democratic Party, (PDP) at the Presidential Election Petition Court, (PEPC) without calling a single witness.

    Counsel to the APC, Mr Lateef Fagbemi, SAN, told the court that there was no need ”Whipping a dead horse” saying the evidence of President Bola Tinubu ‘s sole witness, Sen. Opeyemi Bamide was enough to do damage to the petitioner’s case.

     “Having taken a sober reflection of the entire case, we have enough evidence and we are not calling any witnesses.

    ”We do not intend to whip a dead horse, we announce the closure of the case of the 3rd respondent, (the APC),” Fagbemi said.

    Fagbemi took this position after he cross-examined Bamidele who was Tinubu’s star and only witness. 

    Bamidele who is also a lawyer, told the court that the 460,000 dollars forfeiture judgment tendered in evidence by the petitioners was not strong enough to warrant the nullification of Tinubu’s election.

    According to the witness, the judgment of the US court on the forfeiture of 460,000 dollars had Tinubu’s name on it but not as a criminal proceeding but as a civil proceeding.

    The witness insisted that it was not a criminal forfeiture but a civil one.

    Bamidele, who is the Senate Majority Leader held that Tinubu was not charged, arraigned, indicted, or sentenced for any criminal offense by any court in the United States.

    ”As far as the criminal indictment is concerned, Tinubu has a clean bill of health because he was never indicted and convicted by any court in the United States.”

    The witness told the court that he had known President Tinubu for over 35 years adding that in all those years, he knew the president as a bonafide Nigerian citizen by birth.

    While answering questions posed by counsel to the petitioners’, Mr Eyitayo Jegede, SAN, the witness said that  Tinubu did not need to score 25 percent of votes cast in the Federal Capital Territory, (FCT) to be declared winner of the February 25 presidential election.

    He also said that the president did not need to win the election in his home state to be declared winner.

    The witness insisted that Abuja was simply the federal capital city and had no special status attached to it.

    He agreed with the petitioners’ counsel that President Tinubu scored 19.4 percent of the total votes cast in FCT.

    The witness who was led in evidence by counsel to Tinubu, Mr Wole Olanipekin, SAN,  said a  judgment of the Federal High Court,  Abuja, in a suit filed by Labour Party on the mode of collation of election results, held that INEC was at liberty to use any mode of collation it deemed fit.

    The witness also told the court that he was licensed to practice at the New York Bar in the United States as well.

    With the sole witness, Olanipekun also announced the closure of Tinubu’s defence against the petition filed by the PDP and Atiku.

    The closing of the defence by Tinubu and the APC marks the end of one phase and takes the case filed by PDP and Atiku to its next phase which is the exchanging of final written addresses among parties and closing arguments.

    The presiding judge of the five-member panel, Justice Haruna Tsammani gave the respondents, INEC, APC, and Tinubu 10 days to file their final written addresses while the petitioners have seven days to respond and the respondents have another five days to reply on points of law.

    Justice Tsammani said that the parties would be communicated on the date for the adoption of the final written addresses.

    Recall that Atiku came second in the February 25 presidential election, but he is urging the court to overturn Tinubu’s victory on account of electoral fraud and non-compliance with statutory provisions in the conduct of the election. 

  • TRIBUNAL: Tinubu tenders 18 exhibits against Obi, LP

    TRIBUNAL: Tinubu tenders 18 exhibits against Obi, LP

    President Bola Tinubu and his Deputy, Kashim Shettima on Wednesday at the Presidential Election Petition Court (PEPC), tendered 18 Exhibits to establish their requisite qualifications for the 2023 Presidential Election.

    Obi and Labour Party are seeking nullification of Tinubu’s election on the ground of not having requisite educational qualifications, conviction for drug-related offences by a US Court among others.

    However, at the proceeding, Wednesday, while Tinubu presented his records at the Chicago State University to the Court, Shetima tendered his letter of withdrawal from Borno South Senatorial race upon been picked to be Vice Presidential candidate.

    He also tendered a letter of February 3, 2003 signed by a former Inspector General of Police (IGP), Tafa Balogun requesting for the criminal records of Bola Ahmed Tinubu from the Embassy of the United States of America USA in Nigeria.

    At the Wednesday’s proceedings where they opened their defense in a joint petition of the  LP and  Obi, Tinubu tendered another letter from the US Embassy which in response to Police letter, claimed not having any criminal records of Tinubu.

    While the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC) and the All Progressives Congress APC did not object to tendering and admitting the documents as exhibits, the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) and its presidential candidate, Alhaji Abubakar Atiku vehemently kicked against admission of the documents.

    However, in spite of the vehement objection by PDP and Atiku, the Court admitted the documents as exhibits to be used to determine whether the President actually attended the Chicago State University and to as determine whether he was convicted in the United States of America USA for any drug offences as alleged by Obi and his party.

    Similar exhibits had on Tuesday been admitted by the same Court but in a different petition of Alhaji Abubakar Atiku and PDP who are also asking the Court to kick out Tinubu from the Presidency on the same grounds.

  • Tribunal: APC declines to open defence against Obi, Atiku

    Tribunal: APC declines to open defence against Obi, Atiku

    The All Progressives Congress (APC) on Wednesday declined to open its defence in the petition of the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) and its presidential candidate, Abubakar Atiku and Mr Peter Obi of the Labour Party (LP), seeking to sack President Ahmed Bola Tinubu as Nigerian President.

    When the ruling party was called to open its defence, APC, through its lead counsel, Prince Lateef Fagbemi SAN, said that there was absolutely nothing to defend in the separate petitions of the Labour Party and the PDP.

    This is coming afte cross-examining Tinubu’s star and only witness, Senator Michael Opeyemi Bamidele.

    In his testimonials, the Senate Majority Leader, admitted that Tinubu’s election cannot be reversed on the strength of his forfeiture of $460,000 to the United States of America (USA) through a court order.

    The witness maintained that Tinubu was not arraigned, indicted nor sentenced for any criminal charge by any American Court, adding that civil forfeiture cannot take the place of criminal trial and conviction.

    “As far as criminal indictment is concerned, Bola Ahmed Tinubu has a clean bill of health because he was never indicted and convicted by any American Court,” Bamidele said.

    Sequel to the conclusion of the cross examination of the witness, and time for APC to open defence, Fagbemi said, “Having taken a sober reflection of the entire case we have enough evidence and we are not calling any witness,  we do not intend to whip dead horses, we announce the closure of the case of the 3rd respondent”

    Earlier, the Senate Majority Leader had told the Presidential Election Petition Court that President Bola Tinubu does not need to score 25 percent of votes cast in the FCT to be declared winner of the February 25 election.

    The witness, who was cross-examined by Eyitayo Jegede, SAN, counsel to Atiku and PDP, said although Abuja is the Federal Capital of Nigeria it has no special status other than that. 

    The witness said it does not matter that Tinubu emerged as the first President to be declared without scoring 25 percent votes in FCT and not winning his home state, he admitted that Tinubu scored 19.4 percent in total votes cast in the FCT.

    Furthermore, the witness, said the judgment of the US court on the forfeiture of $460,000 has Tinubu’s name but not as a criminal suspect but as civil proceedings, insisting that it was civil forfeiture and not a criminal forfeiture.

    Under further cross examination by counsel to APC, Prince Lateef Fagbemi SAN, the witness agreed that there cannot be a conviction without a charge, trial, indictment and conviction.

    Meanwhile, the Court has given the respondents 10 days to file their final written addresses, and the petitioner 7 days to respond and 5 days to reply on point of law.

    The court said that the parties would be communicated on the date for the adoption of the final written addresses.

  • Tribunal: Rhodes-Vivour closes case against Sanwo-Olu, Hamzat

    Tribunal: Rhodes-Vivour closes case against Sanwo-Olu, Hamzat

    The Lagos State Labour Party governorship candidate, Gbadebo Rhodes-Vivour has closed his case against the victory of Governor Babajide Sanwo-Olu in the March 18 governorship election before the election tribunal sitting in Ikeja.

    The Labour Party governorship candidate is also challenging the eligibility of Hazmat to contest on the grounds that he allegedly renounced his Nigerian citizenship and swore allegiance to the United States of America.

    At the resumed hearing on Tuesday, the petitioner’s counsel, Mr Idowu Benson, informed the three-justice tribunal headed by Arum Ashom that the petitioner was closing his case.

    Ten witnesses had testified in the petition of the LP candidate.

    The counsel also tendered a Certified True Copy (CTC) of the INEC Form EC9 – an affidavit containing the particulars of a candidate – which was hand-filled by Hamzat and had been front-loaded by the counsel for the fourth respondent, All Progressives Congress (APC), before the tribunal.

    All the counsel for the four respondents objected to the admissibility of the document tendered by the petitioner.

    The tribunal, however, admitted the document into evidence and marked it as Exhibit PE713.

    The APC counsel, Mr Noris Quakers (SAN), said the CTC tendered by the petitioner was warehoused by the first respondent and did not form a part of the court records.

    “It is not a document before this tribunal.

    “It is only a document signed by the Independent National Electoral Commission that can be tendered.

    “We will further argue on why this document should not be admitted in the final written address,” he said.

    The INEC counsel, Mr Eric Obigor, informed the tribunal that he would pick a date to open their defence while commending the petitioner for closing his case.

    The tribunal ordered that the first respondent should open his case on the next adjourned date but he prayed the court for more time to put his house in order.

    “We will be taking a date to open our case and commend the petitioner for closing its case even though it was unexpected.

    “At the moment, for me to secure the attendance of my witness, I can not get them by tomorrow.

    “I will need to do consultations with the stakeholders of my client.

    “A day will enable me to put my house in order,” Obigor said.

    Counsel to Sanwo-Olu and Hamzat, Mr Bode Olanipekun (SAN), also commended the petitioner for closing its case while stating that they should have taken the wise retreat earlier.

    The proceedings were stalled on Monday due to the health reasons of an LP witness.

    The tribunal had on Monday adjourned the proceedings due to the ill-health of a witness scheduled to testify in favour of Rhodes-Vivour.

    Benson had mentioned that the witness was in court but had to leave for treatment before proceedings commenced.

    The tribunal adjourned until July 5 for INEC to open its defence. 

  • Tribunal: Tinubu presents Chicago varsity record, US visa, others as exhibits

    Tribunal: Tinubu presents Chicago varsity record, US visa, others as exhibits

    President Bola Ahmed Tinubu, has tendered as evidence, his Chicago State University educational documents and the United States of America visa at the Presidential Election Petition Court on Tuesday.

    The court admitted the documents, and admission letter offered by the university as exhibits as the Respondent formally opened his defense in a petition filed against his election by the People’s Democratic Party (PDP) and its presidential candidate, Abubakar Atiku.

    Tinubu also tendered his US Visa documents between 2011 to 2021, which indicated that he severally visited the United States of America (USA) unhindered, as against the petition that he was wanted by the country.

    Counsel to Tinubu, Chief Wole Olanipekun SAN, also made available to the Court all documents of the Nigeria Immigration Service (NIS) which cleared him for the US trips.

    Also admitted as exhibits by the Court is the United States of America’s Embassy letter of April 4, 2003, which is a response to a letter from the Nigerian Police dated February 3, 2003, which claimed that the Embassy had no criminal records of Tinubu in the USA.

    The documents were admitted amidst objections against their admissibility by Atiku and his party.

    Apart from the educational documents, the Court further admitted an originating summons of a suit instituted at the Supreme Court by the Attorneys General of Adamawa, Akwa Ibom, Bayelsa, Delta, Edo, and Sokoto States, challenging the educational background of Tinubu to stand for the 2023 presidential election.

    The matter continues on July 5.