Author: Vivian Michael

  • Electricity tarrif : NLC, TUC insist on Sunday deadline to reverse hike

    Electricity tarrif : NLC, TUC insist on Sunday deadline to reverse hike

    Nigeria Labour Congress(NLC) and Trade Union Congress of Nigeria(TUC) have given the Nigerian Electricity Regulatory Commission(NERC) till May 12 to withdraw the recent hike in electricity tariff or face unprecedented industrial action.

    The ultimatum was issued in a joint letter to the Chairman/Chief Executive Officer, CEO, was copied to the Secretary to the Government of the Federation, SGF, the Ministers of Labour and Power and the electricity distribution companies, DisCos, among others, Joe Ajaero and Festus Osifo, President of NLC and TUC respectively.

    The letter read: “This is to refer you to our May Day address where we expressed grave concerns regarding the recent announcement of an astronomical hike in electricity tariff across the nation from N65/kWh to N225/Kwh by your commission.

    ‘’We believe that this decision is not just morally reprehensible considering the difficulties Nigerians are faced with currently, but it blatantly disregards fundamental principles and statutory obligations.

    ‘’It is a slap in the face of justice and fairness, and we will not stand idly by as the masses and workers are subjected to such unacceptable exploitation.

    “As the regulator of the electricity sector, it is imperative that your commission grasps the weight of its responsibilities. NERC’s role entails the regulation of electricity tariffs in the country, a duty outlined in explicit detail within the statutes governing the commission.

    ‘’Yet, with this recent tariff hike which you have acquiesced, it is evident that the Commission has forsaken its duty and abandoned the people it was meant to protect to the fat cats in the electricity industry.

    “We are miffed that NERC has become a tacit collaborator in crafting the oppressive pricing regime being perpetuated against Nigerian workers and people. The Laws that set up the commission mandate it to act as an unbiased ombudsman in the electricity industry. ‘’Unfortunately, the reverse is the case as it has acted in cahoots with the Distribution Companies, DisCos and the Generating Companies, GenCos, to promote their nefarious market practices.

    “The announced tariff hike not only defies the established procedure mandated by law but also tramples upon the rights of Nigerian citizens. It is a flagrant abuse of power and a clear violation of the trust bestowed upon your commission by the Nigerian people. Such actions will not be tolerated, and we refuse to accept them as the new norm.

    “Nigerian workers and masses led by the Nigeria Labour Congress, NLC, and the Trade Union Congress of Nigeria, TUC, stand united in denouncing this injustice. We must defend the rights of our fellow citizens against exploitation.

    “Therefore, we demand an immediate reversal of the hike in electricity tariff to N65/kwh, immediate cessation of the discriminatory practice of segregating electricity consumers into arbitrary bands, and restoration of the supremacy of the statutes governing the conduct of operators within the electricity industry.

    “We give you until Sunday, May 12, 2024, to comply. Failure to do so will result in swift and decisive action on our part as we will not hesitate to mobilize our members and occupy all NERC’s offices and those of the DisCos nationwide until justice is served.”

  • Ikeja Electric slashes tariff for Band A customers

    Ikeja Electric slashes tariff for Band A customers

    Ikeja Electric Distribution Company (IE) Monday, revealed that it has reduced it’s electricity tariff for customers under Band A from N225/kWh to N206.80/kWh.
    This was made known through a circular by the management of the company on its “X”(Formerly Twitter) page on Monday.
    Specifically, it said the customers will now pay N206.80/kwh as against the N225/kwh ordered by the Nigeria Electricity Regulatory Commission (NERC).
    According to the statement, IE guaranteed to provide 20 to 24 hours of electricity to users under this Band, adding that the tariff for customers under other categories will remain the same.

    It said: “Dear Esteemed Customers, Please be informed of the downward tariff review of our Band A feeders from N225/kwh to N206.80/kwh effective 6th May 2024 with guaranteed availability of 20-24hrs supply daily.
    “The tariff for Bands B, C, D, and E remains unchanged.”

  • FG, states will review sentencing for suicide attempt – AGF

    FG, states will review sentencing for suicide attempt – AGF

    The Attorney General of the Federation and Minister of Justice, Prince Lateef Fagbemi (SAN), has promised a review of the law imposing sentencing for suicide attempts.

    He gave the promise when he received a delegation from the Asido Foundation, a non-governmental organisation promoting mental health advocacy and reforms with a view to improving awareness, reducing stigma and discrimination and empowering persons with mental disorders and their families.

    In a statement signed by Kamarudeen Ogundele,
    S A to the President on Communications & Publicity,
    Office of the AGF, Sunday, the Minister said health is one of the priority areas of the administration of President Bola Ahmed Tinubu.

    “The law is something we have to take a second look at, especially where it is established that the offenders are not in the right state of mind. What the offenders need is pity, treatment and love so as to rid society of this kind of situation.

    “But whatever we do is not binding on the states. So, I will take the case to the Body of Attorneys General,” Fagbemi said.

    He promised to take up the issues around the Mental Health Act with his colleagues in the Federal Ministry of Health.

    Earlier, the founder of Asido, Dr Jibril Abdulmalik, sought the help of the AGF in reviewing the law sentencing people for attempted suicide and the implementation of the Mental Health Act signed into law by former President Muhammadu Buhari in January 2023.

    Abdulmalik said medical evidence had shown that all over the world, 80-90 percent of those who attempted suicide had background mental illness, especially depression.

    “It is because of sense of hopelessness that makes them get to the edge where they think they are better off dying.

    “In that situation what they need is help and treatment, not punishment and incarceration. We know the workload is heavy for our judicial officers…We don’t want them overburdened with cases that should ordinarily go to the hospitals,” he added.

  • Court bars Kano DisCo from implementing new tariff

    Court bars Kano DisCo from implementing new tariff

    A Federal High Court in Kano has issued an order restraining the National Electricity Regulatory Commission and the Kano Electricity Distribution Company from implementing the new electricity tariff for Band A consumers.

    The suit marked FHC/KN/CS/144/2024 was filed by Super Sack Company Limited and BBY Sacks Limited.

    Others are Mama Sannu Industries Limited, Dala Foods Nigeria Limited, Tofa Textile Limited, and Manufacturers Association Of Nigeria Limited.

    However, ruling on an ex-parte motion by Abubakar Mahmoud, counsel to the plaintiffs, the presiding judge, Abdullahi Liman, ordered NERC and KEDCO from going ahead with the impending tariff pending the hearing and determination of the motion on notice filed before it.

    The order also restrained the defendant from intimidating and threatening to disconnect the applicants’ electricity supply for non-acceptance of the new increased tariff.

    Recall that in April, NERC approved an increase in electricity tariff for customers under the Band A classification.

    With the new tariff, customers under the category, who receive 20 hours of electricity supply daily, would begin to pay N225 per kilowatt, starting from April 3 — up from N66.

    The sudden hike has since been criticized by the House of Representatives and other stakeholders who have asked NERC to suspend the implementation of the new tariff.

  • MultiChoice defies court order, increases DStv, GOtv subscriptions

    MultiChoice defies court order, increases DStv, GOtv subscriptions

    MultiChoice Nigeria Limited has ignored an interim order granted to the Competition and Consumer Protection Tribunal (CCPT) in Abuja, and increased the subscription rates for its DStv and GOtv bouquets.

    Recall that on Monday, the tribunal issued a clear injunction restraining MultiChoice Nigeria from increasing its subscription prices, which were set to take effect on May 1.

    The tribunal also granted an application for substituted service of the interim order, after reports surfaced that MultiChoice’s officers at its Abuja office refused to accept the court documents.

    In a ruling, the presiding officer, Saratu Shafii, said the decision underscores the tribunal’s commitment to ensuring that MultiChoice complies with its orders.

    The applicant, an Abuja based lawyer, Festus Onifade, told reporters that a top manager at the Abuja office directed that any document should instead be sent to their Lagos headquarters.

    However, according to reports the new subscription fees were enforced on Wednesday, May 1, much to the dismay of millions of subscribers who waited for the company to halt the new rates.

    Following this development, consumers viewed the increase as a betrayal by MultiChoice and accused the cable company of disregarding both the legal system and customer interests.

  • Contempt: A/Court grants EFCC’s  stay of proceedings against Yahaya Bello …fixes May 20 for hearing

    Contempt: A/Court grants EFCC’s stay of proceedings against Yahaya Bello …fixes May 20 for hearing

    The Court of Appeal, Friday, granted an exparte motion for stay of proceedings filed by the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission(EFCC) against the contempt proceeding instituted by the former Governor of Kogi State, Yahaya Bello, against the Chairman of the Commission, Ola Olukoyede.

    Justice Joseph O.K. Oyewole, consequently granted the EFCC’s application to serve the processes in the Appeal by substituted means on the former governor.

    Consequently, the matter was adjourned for hearing of the motion on notice to May 20, 2024.

    The EFCC boss who was summoned to appear before the Kogi State High Court on May 13, 2024, to show cause why he should not be committed to prison for disobeying the Orders of the court, had appealed the Ruling of the trial Court and sought a stay of the proceeding of the Court.

    The EFCC boss is facing a contempt charge for carrying out “some acts upon which they (the EFCC) have been restrained” by the Court on February 9, 2024, pending the determination of the substantive Originating Motion.

    Justice I. A. Jamil, delivering a ruling in Suit No: HCL/68M/2024 and Motion No: HCL/190M/2024, ordered that “the said act was carried out by the Respondent (EFCC) in violation of the order, which was valid and subsisting when they carried out the act. That same act of the Respondent amounts to Contempt.

    EFCC operatives had laid siege on the residence of the immediate past Governor of Kogi State, Alhaji Yahaya Bello, as early as 8am on April 17, 2024, with a bid to arrest him, despite a court order restraining them from taking such action, pending the determination of the Originating Motion.

    Justice Jamil’s order was based on a motion ex-parte filed by Yahaya Bello through his lawyer, M.S. Yusuf, Esq, where he prayed the court for an order to issue and serve the Respondent (EFCC Chairman) with Form 49 Notice to show cause why Order of committal should not be made on Olukoyede.

  • Court adjourns  Rivers LGs/Govt, AGF, Police, DSS, others case till May 22

    Court adjourns Rivers LGs/Govt, AGF, Police, DSS, others case till May 22

    The Federal High Court, Abuja, on Thursday, adjourned hearing in the suit seeking to stop the Rivers State Government from withholding the financial allocations of the 42 Local Government Councils in the state, to May 22.

    The presiding judge, Justice James Omotosho, adjourned the matter to enable parties already served with the court’s documents respond accordingly, just as he ordered service on the 1st to 4th and 6th respondents who were neither in court nor represented by any lawyer.

    At the last adjourned date, the court, while ruling in an ex-parte application, refused to issue an interim order against the Rivers State government and other respondents pending the hearing of the main suit.

    He ordered the plaintiffs to put the respondents on notice and ordered all parties to maintain the status quo by not doing anything that would render the suit nugatory.

    However, when the matter was called on Thursday, while the 1st – 4th and 6th were absent in court, M. N. Umoh, Olumide Fusika, SAN, Damian Okoro, SAN, and Sammie Somiari, SAN, appeared for the 5th, 7th, 8th and 9th respondents respectively.

    The four lawyers all admitted service of court order to maintain status quo and asked for time to respond, adding that they are still within the time allowed by law to file their responses.

    When asked by the judge if they were also served with the court’s order directing all parties to maintain status quo, all but the 5th defendant admitted service.

    Justice Omotosho told the respondents that he had declined to grant the interim order but after plaintiffs’ counsel, Clement Ijom stated that salaries of teachers, primary health workers and other local government staff depend on the allocation, he then ordered parties to maintain status quo pending the hearing and determination of the matter.

    Subsequently, the judge ordered the respondents to file in their responses, while the suit is served on the remaining respondents.

    The Inspector General (IG) of Police, Commissioner of Police (CP) Rivers, Director General (DG) State Security (SSS), Director SSS Rivers, Attorney-General of the Federation (AGF), Chairman Revenue Mobilization Allocation and Fiscal Commission, Rivers State Government, AG Rivers State and Finance Commissioner in Rivers are 1st to 9th respondents respectively.

    The plaintiffs, on the other hand, include Dr Chidi LLoyd, Chairman, Emohua Local Government, Hon Alwell Ihunda Chairman, Port Harcourt Local goyvernment, Dr Nwanosike Samuel, Ikwerre Local Government, amongst others.

    They are suing the respondents over the financial allocation to the council as well as their personal security.

    Pending the hearing and determination of their motion on notice for interlocutory injunction, the plaintiffs had filed an ex-parte application seeking to restrain the Rivers State Government from withholding their financial allocation.

    They had also prayed the court to restrain the security agencies from withdrawing the security personnel attached to them.

    In the suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/537/2024, and filed by their lawyer, Aliyu Hussein, the local government Chairmen, also sought an order prohibiting the defendants from preventing the enforcement or implementation of the newly amended Rivers State Local Government Law N:5 of 2024 pending the determination of the motion.

    In a 33 paragraph affidavit in support of the application deposed to by Dr Chidi LLoyd, Chairman of Emohua Local Government, the applicants claimed to have been duly elected in a democratically conducted election for a term of three years under the provisions of the Rivers State Local Government Law.

    They asserted that they are autonomous and constitutionally recognized as one of the tiers of the government and that Rivers State House of Assembly Enacted Rivers State Amended Law to guide their affairs and activities.

    They claimed that Rivers State Government, AG and Finance Commissioner who are not happy with the amended law have approached the IGP, CP, DG SSS and Director SSS seeking the withdrawal of policing and other security services from them in order to frustrate the implementation of the amended law.

    The Chairmen alleged that the Police Commissioner in the state who has the responsibility to advise the IG on the policing and security needs of Rivers State is under substantial control of Rivers State Government and would implement the directive of the state government.

    They further asserted that it would be impossible for them to carry out their respective functions and duties without the policing and security services of the IG.

    The Council chairmen asked the court to restrain the defendants, especially the Rivers State Government, from taking the law into its hand.

    They promised to undertake to pay for damages if their suit turns to be frivolous.

  • Terrorism: Miyetti Allah President, Bodejo knows fate on bail application May 30

    Terrorism: Miyetti Allah President, Bodejo knows fate on bail application May 30

    Justice Inyang Ekwo of the Federal High Court in Abuja has fixed May 30 for ruling in a bail application filed by the detained leader of the Miyetti Allah Kautal Hore, Bello Bodejo,

    Bodejo who was accused of unlawfully establishing an ethnic militia group, Kungiya Zaman Lafiya to promote terrorism has been in the custody of the Defence Intelligence Agency (DIA) in Abuja.

    He was arraigned in March on a three-count charge filed by the office of the Attorney General of the Federation (AGF), in which he was accused of violating the Terrorism (Prevention and Prohibition) Act, 2022.

    He denied the charges

    Moving application for his bail on Tuesday Bodejo’s lawyer, Ahmed Raji, a Senior Advocate of Nigeria (SAN), pleaded with Justice Ekwo to admit his client to bail on various grounds ranging from ill health to fundamental rights.

    He asked the court for “an order admitting the defendant to bail on liberal terms pending the hearing and determination of the charges preferred against him.”

    The senior lawyer predicated the bail request on the ground that Bodejo “suffers from grave ill-health and that the offences are bailable.

    Citing Section 36 of the Nigerian constitution, Raji said his client is presumed innocent until proven guilty adding that the charge against Bodejo did not disclose any crime against him.

    Contrary to government assertions, Raji informed the court that launching of the group by his client was done in a public place with Police Commissioner and personnel of other security agencies as well as Nasarawa State government officials in attendance.

    In an affidavit deposed to by Mohammed Musa, a brother to Mr Bodejo,in support of the bail bid, he said the Miyetti Allah leader who was arrested by DIA personnel on 23 January, has “been denied access to his lawyers, family members, friends and well wishers.”

    Musa described Bodejo as a “patriotic Nigerian citizen who goes about his business within the ambit of the laws of the Federal Republic of Nigeria.”

    The deponent further said that Bodejo “neither established nor has any involvement with the ethnic militia group as alleged in the charge against him.”

    He explained that the essence of establishing the vigilante company was to provide security services to the members of the society and not to commit any act of terrorism as alleged by giving.

    However ,the federal government, through it’s lawyer, Y.A Imana, urged the court to reject Bodejo’s bail application on the ground that charges against the defendant borders on threat to national security.

    After taking arguments from the two parties, Justice Ekwo fixed 30th May for ruling in the bail application.

  • Edo Guber: Court strikes out suits against Ighodalo’s candidacy for PDP

    Edo Guber: Court strikes out suits against Ighodalo’s candidacy for PDP

    Justice Inyang Ekwo of the Federal High Court, Abuja, Tuesday, struck out two separate suits challenging the Peoples Democratic Party (PDP)’s primary election that produced Asue Ighodalo as the party’s governorship candidate for the coming Edo State gubernatorial election.

    In the ruling, Justice Ekwo held that those who instituted the suits from the political camp of former Deputy Governor of the state, Philip Shuaib, have no locus standi.

    The court held that the plaintiffs failed to exhibit sufficient, direct, and tangible personal interest that could lead the court to nullify the primary election.

    The first suit marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/195/2024, was filed by Adizetu Umoru, while the second suit marked: FHC/ABJ/CS/196/2024, was filed by Moses Alabi and Christopher Oboarer.

    The plaintiffs had sued the Independent National Electoral Commission(INEC), PDP, Umar Damagu (acting national chairman), Setonji Koshoedo, PDP’s National Working Committee (NWC), and its National Executive Committee (NEC) as 1st to 6th defendants respectively.

    The three plaintiffs, in their separate motions filed on February 19, sought an interim order of the court restraining the defendants from using the list of ward congresses held in February. 4, for the purpose of conducting the PDP’s primary in Edo State, slated for February. 22 or any other date pending the hearing and determination of the main suit.

    Justice Ekwo, however, held that the plaintiffs did not establish how their individual interests were affected or jeopardized by the primary election.

    Specifically, the judge said that the plaintiffs did not establish whether they were eligible to participate in the election but prevented or whether wrongdoings were displayed during the election.

  • PayTV Operators Have Right To Fix Prices – BON

    PayTV Operators Have Right To Fix Prices – BON

    The Broadcasting Organisation of Nigeria (BON) says that pay TV operators and other related service providers in the country have the choice and right to fix their desired fees.

    DSTV and GoTv are billed to begin a review in the new price hike l 1, 2024.

    BON’s position stems from the social media calls on the Federal Competition and Con¬sumer Protection Commission (FCCPC) to review the new price hike proposition.

    In a statement issued by BON and signed by its Exec¬utive Secretary, Yemisi Bamg-bose, tagged ‘Increase in Price of Goods and Services – Let Pay Tv Providers Fix their Prices’, it took exceptions to the posi¬tion of some netizens for kick¬ing against the upward price review by MultiChoice, owner of DsTV and GoTv.

    According to Bamgbose, “I was going through social media last Friday, and I came across a story titled ‘FCCPC to review the new price hike for DSTV and GOTV’. What a wonderful way of protecting consumers’ interests.

    “I would have given FCCPC thumbs up if they have been intervening on price matters, most especially those that have direct bearing on the livelihood of the masses. If the mandate of FCCPC includes price con¬trol of goods and services in a free and deregulated economy, where was the organisation when bakers association in the country increased the cost of a loaf of bread more than 200% in the last one year? Bread is an essential commodity. What took away the mandate of FC¬CPC to review the cost of the most staple food of the com¬mon man which Nigerians can no longer afford?”

    Stating further, Bamgbose expressed doubts if FCCPC was aware that a sachet of pure water had been increased from N5 to N20 in the last one year. She also queried why FCCPC didn’t stop the bottling companies in the country from astro-nomically increasing the cost of Malt and other soft drinks and didn’t call stakeholders meeting to review the new prices.

    On the cost of a bag of cement which has now been in¬creased from N4,000 in the last one year, she asked why FCCPC did not deem it fit to invite Dangote, BUA and Lafarge cement manufacturers with relevant stakeholders to discuss the more than 100% increase on a bag of cement. Aviation sector, according to her, on a daily ba¬sis, increases the cost of domes¬tic flights.

    In the education sector, she wondered why FCCPC could not call for the review of the cost being charged by private educational institutions, especially those charging in dollars in a country where naira is the legal tender.
    “On the part of broadcasting, I want to assume that FC¬CPC does not know what goes into the business of broadcasting. Perhaps, that could inform the decision of the agency to plan the proposed review of the increase in the price of DsTv and GoTv pay TV channels, respectively.

    “I would not blame FCCPC for inadequate information about the challenges confronting players in the broadcast sector, more so, that media practitioners are saddled with the responsibility of dancing the dance of other people and also mandated to carry loads of others on their heads while leaving their own luggage un¬attended.
    nels, state owned radio and TV stations, private radio stations, etc where consumers don’t pay to listen to radio or watch television. There are subscription channels such as MULTI¬CHOICE, GOtv, TNtv, STAR¬TIMES, etc where viewers pay to watch and listen. There are choices.”

    She said that during COVID-19 pandemic, stations burnt diesel without adverts or other sources of revenue for more than twelve months in national interest. “The centre is yet to hold before the last straw that broke the camel’s back came in the name of subsidy removal from petroleum products as well as floating of the nation’s currency”, BON said.

    The challenge, according to her, is that not many people buy diesel to run business and they can switch on and off as they want depending on their needs. They should not be blamed for not knowing what it means to buy a litre above N1,500. To sev¬eral others, the removal of fuel subsidy affected the premium motor spirit only, it noted.

    “The cost of diesel rose from N200 per litre in 2021 to N1,700 per litre in 2023/24, and broad¬cast stations have to transmit for twenty-four hours changing from one generator to the other.

    “None of the national stations such as Channels TV, Arise, TVC, AIT, Silverbird, NTA, amongst others, commits less than N100 million on diesel on monthly basis to keep their mandate of information, education and entertainment.

    “It may interest the public to know that many, if not all, of the national radio and television stations in Nigeria have not been able to break-even since 2020 when the nation’s economy was shut down as a result to COVID-19 pandemic. In Nigeria, we want everything free.

    “What subscribers pay to MultiChoice, Startimes or any DTT and DTH is the quality of content of many channels brought direct to their homes or offices. It’s a business and there are choices.